Could Spencer Pratt Upend California Politics?

Photo by Andy Kropa/Invision/AP, File

I am writing a lot about Spencer Pratt for a reason, and it's not just that he's running an interesting race. 

Win or lose, he has already upended politics in Los Angeles, and if he manages to win outright, he could fundamentally change California politics altogether. 

Advertisement

Less than a month ago, the betting favorite to be the next Mayor of Los Angeles was Nithya Raman, the City Councilor who decided to challenge Mayor Karen Bass at the last minute. She had endorsed Bass for reelection but was convinced by supporters to challenge her from the left, and everyone assumed the candidate farthest left would win, especially given Bass' horrendous record. 

Then came the Los Angeles Mayor's race debate, and the breakout performance of Spencer Pratt, who until then was seen as an entertaining nuisance candidate. 

Bass was her vacuous self, prattling on about how much better Los Angeles has been under her guidance. At least the parts of it still standing. She was basically playing prevent defense, trying to make no gaffes so she could count on her political machine to carry her over the finish line. It was a good strategy because, under the jungle primary system, she was basically guaranteed one of the top two slots in the general election, and indeed she will be on the ballot this fall unless Pratt wins 50% outright next month. 

Advertisement

Raman, though, had a strategy of running to the left of Bass, and found out the hard way that this strategy does not meet the moment in Los Angeles. 

Nobody wants to hear the same ol' shite right now. A vast swath of the city is literally in ruins, the homeless are destroying everywhere they set up camp, there are needles in the streetโ€”provided courtesy of the City of Los Angeles, no lessโ€”and prostitutes are roaming the streets due to outrageous policies that Democrats keep pushing. 

The Pratt effect is so large that a debate scheduled for tomorrow has been canceled after first Bass, then Raman, decided to bail out. 

Advertisement

๐“๐‡๐„ ๐‹๐Ž๐’ ๐€๐๐†๐„๐‹๐„๐’ ๐Œ๐€๐˜๐Ž๐‘๐€๐‹ ๐ƒ๐„๐๐€๐“๐„ ๐’๐‚๐‡๐„๐ƒ๐”๐‹๐„๐ƒ ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐–๐„๐ƒ๐๐„๐’๐ƒ๐€๐˜ ๐‰๐”๐’๐“ ๐‚๐Ž๐‹๐‹๐€๐๐’๐„๐ƒ ๐„๐๐“๐ˆ๐‘๐„๐‹๐˜ ๐€๐…๐“๐„๐‘ ๐‚๐Ž๐”๐๐‚๐ˆ๐‹๐–๐Ž๐Œ๐€๐ ๐๐ˆ๐“๐‡๐˜๐€ ๐‘๐€๐Œ๐€๐ ๐‰๐Ž๐ˆ๐๐„๐ƒ ๐Œ๐€๐˜๐Ž๐‘ ๐Š๐€๐‘๐„๐ ๐๐€๐’๐’ ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐’๐๐„๐๐‚๐„๐‘ ๐๐‘๐€๐“๐“ ๐ˆ๐ ๐€๐๐‘๐”๐๐“๐‹๐˜ ๐๐”๐‹๐‹๐ˆ๐๐† ๐Ž๐”๐“, ๐‹๐„๐€๐•๐ˆ๐๐† ๐Ž๐๐‹๐˜ ๐“๐–๐Ž ๐Œ๐ˆ๐๐Ž๐‘ ๐‚๐€๐๐ƒ๐ˆ๐ƒ๐€๐“๐„๐’ ๐’๐“๐ˆ๐‹๐‹ ๐–๐ˆ๐‹๐‹๐ˆ๐๐† ๐“๐Ž ๐’๐‡๐Ž๐– ๐”๐.

The Pat Brown Institute and the League of Women Voters issued the joint statement:

โ€˜๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ.โ€

The pull-out sequence:

โ€” Bass withdrew first, last week, citing travel to Sacramento for homelessness and Palisades fire recovery funding.

โ€” Pratt followed with a stated scheduling conflict.

โ€” Raman pulled out Monday morning, leaving only businessman Adam Miller and activist Rae Huang on the stage.

The context Bass does not want televised: ๐š๐ญ ๐ฅ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐คโ€™๐ฌ ๐๐๐‚ ๐๐ž๐›๐š๐ญ๐ž, ๐๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐š๐ฌ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฉ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐›๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐š๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐‘๐š๐ฆ๐š๐ง. A second forum on Wednesday would have meant another full-camera evening of Pratt asking Bass why ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐Ÿ‘๐ŸŽ ๐ก๐จ๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐ซ๐ž๐›๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐š๐๐ž๐ฌ ๐š๐ ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ’,๐Ÿ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ“ ๐š๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ.

The Raman angle is the most politically damaging. The councilwoman who ๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ โ€˜๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐žโ€ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ก openly reversed course on CNN this weekend:

โ€˜๐˜ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฑ. ๐˜—๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜บ.โ€

Her DSA-aligned base instantly accused her of ๐ซ๐ž๐›๐ซ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  under the pressure of disorder her own movement created. She pulled out of Wednesdayโ€™s debate within 48 hours of the backlash.

๐–๐‡๐„๐ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐’๐ˆ๐“๐“๐ˆ๐๐† ๐Œ๐€๐˜๐Ž๐‘ ๐€๐๐ƒ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐“๐Ž๐ ๐“๐–๐Ž ๐‚๐Ž๐”๐๐‚๐ˆ๐‹ ๐‚๐‡๐€๐‹๐‹๐„๐๐†๐„๐‘๐’ ๐€๐‹๐‹ ๐‘๐„๐…๐”๐’๐„ ๐“๐Ž ๐’๐‡๐€๐‘๐„ ๐€ ๐’๐“๐€๐†๐„ ๐–๐ˆ๐“๐‡ ๐€ ๐‘๐„๐€๐‹๐ˆ๐“๐˜-๐“๐• ๐’๐“๐€๐‘, ๐ˆ๐“ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐๐Ž๐“ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐‘๐„๐€๐‹๐ˆ๐“๐˜-๐“๐• ๐’๐“๐€๐‘ ๐–๐‡๐Ž ๐‹๐€๐‚๐Š๐’ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐†๐‘๐€๐•๐ˆ๐“๐€๐’.

Advertisement

Bass and Raman are both scrambling. Raman's chances for winning are essentially gone because she has no political machine to fall back on, while Bass only remains in the running because she has the overwhelming support of the union/NGO complex that can reliably deliver votes for a pet rock. 

Of course, the message of that cartel shows how little it is about the voters of Los Angeles. Their ad, which appeals to people pillaging the city and the state, certainly falls flat with the average voter in L.A. Almost nobody, except the people living off the taxpayers as parasites, thinks L.A. is moving in the right direction, and at least the Federation of Labor folks are making clear that they don't give a rip. They want social worker jobs, and that's it. 

Advertisement

Of course, despite the fact that Pratt is scaring the bejeezus out of the Democratic Party establishment, Bass has the inside track. She does have the machine behind her, and that machine has been rigging the system for decades. 

So the election comes down to the machine versus the people, much as the 2016 election did. The smart money bet on Hillary!, and lost, barely. Politics has never been the same. 

Could the same thing happen in Los Angeles? Probably not, but you never know. Pratt is a talent, and he has broken through the noise. 

He could win. And if he does, nothing will be the same in California, either. 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy HotAir's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement